Polish Rental Market Thriving Amidst Data Gaps: Over a Million Poles Supplement Income Through Property

The dream of passive income is becoming a reality for a growing number of Poles, with over 1.14 million individuals declaring income from property rentals and leases in 2024. This marks a significant increase of more than 66,000 taxpayers compared to 2023, according to the Ministry of Finance. This surge highlights a robust private rental market, even as official data on its true scale remains surprisingly elusive.

Despite the state lacking comprehensive statistics on the total number of rented apartments, average rents, or the prevalence of multiple property owners, the trend of Poles supplementing their salaries through real estate is undeniable. The allure of regular income without constant active involvement, often achieved through strategic property investment, continues to attract individuals seeking financial independence.

Currently, real estate rentals in Poland are taxed solely on a lump-sum basis. The basic tax rate stands at 8.5%, though approximately 52,000 taxpayers, exceeding the PLN 100,000 revenue threshold, faced a higher rate of 12.5% on their income, as reported by Hanna Milewska-Wilk of the Institute of Urban and Regional Development. It’s crucial for investors to note that after two years, rental property is taxed at a flat rate, and deductions for expenses like depreciation are no longer permitted.

While property investment is often guided by location, attractiveness, and price, the actual return on investment in Poland typically hovers just over 3% after accounting for furnishing costs, potential vacant periods (often 10 months of rental, not 12), renovations, and taxes.

Poland’s rented accommodation rate, at roughly 13%, is among the lowest in the EU, representing an estimated 3.2 million residents. Eurostat suggests that about 4.3% of Polish households pay market rent, based on public opinion surveys. Compounding the data challenge, the Central Statistical Office (GUS) does not conduct such surveys, nor is there an Integrated Real Estate Information System or a requirement for comprehensive land and mortgage registers. This data vacuum means that while the private rental market demonstrably flourishes, a full governmental understanding of its dynamics remains a future aspiration.